There two separate issues here: action (what Obama does) and reaction (how hoi polloi react).

I want to focus on door number 2. The "Don Obama" tripe is not the only evidence of runaway monarchism on display at dKos. This morning a poll was put up there asking for opinions about another dynastic transfer of the newly vacant NY Senatorial seat. When I first looked the vote was overwhelmingly pro-Kennedy; now it is closer but still pro-primogeniture:

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/12/8/94530/1645/764/670474

(post is long; scroll down)

I expect this kind of knee-jerk fealty from the authoritarian right; it is deeply disturbing to see the same willingness to bow to royalty on the left.

The great philosopher Pogo was right.

This is something that's been bothering me, principally because I'm not sure whether or not it should bother me, but I think it should. I'm apologizing ahead of the thought because I'm really not sure of the thought.

In mid-November, a blogger named Tarek Mehanna, who blogged under the name Abu Sabaya, was arrested at Logan Airport by the FBI. Having recently graduated from school, he was on his way to start a job at a hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Mehanna is a U.S. citizen by birth and residence, he lives in Sudbury, MA.

In early 2006, the FBI had questioned Mehanna about someone named Dan Maldonado, and according to them and an informer, Mehanna had told them he hadn't talked to Maldonado in weeks, and when he had, Maldonado was in Egypt. Subsequently, Maldonado was arrested crossing from Somalia into Kenya as the Ethiopians, with American backing, drove the Islamic Courts group from power in Somalia. Maldonado was transferred to the U.S., and was convicted on terrorism charges and sentenced to 10 years.

The FBI alleges in the affidavit that Mehanna lied to them, which is a crime, and that Maldonado had actually called him 4 days earlier to try to talk him into joining the fight in Somalia.

Okay. The blog that Mehanna ran is, to me, somewhat unreadable, as it is mostly invocation of Muslim scripture and a lot of quotes from Egyptian brotherhood and such people. He may not be a nice guy. If you read sites like Jawa Report or The Weekly Standard, he is al Qaeda and they acted to end a grave threat to the U.S. due to his jihadi postings on the site, (The Weekly Standard in particular has trouble distinguishing between people who take handles named after Muslim radicals and the radicals themselves, although the latter are long dead). But there is a charge that can be filed if he was recruiting or engaged in hate speech, and no one has filed such a thing. It isn't, as I said, my favorite site either.

But this guy's lawyer says he was arrested to 1) prevent him from leaving the country, and 2) because he would not inform for the FBI. And if lying to the FBI is justification for holding someone without bail, then shouldn't Rove and Libby have been imprisoned during the Scooter Libby trial? The first reason is ominously close to sounding like a mathematician who had been on the Manhattan project who was forbidden from leaving the U.S. (ever) in the 1960s to go to China. Or a friend of mine who was once accused of transporting classified restricted information out of the country because of the knowledge that was in his head. The mathematician's case, at the time, was seen as a violation of freedom of movement by international law types. And the second allegation, jailing someone because they refuse to inform, if true, is just wrong, flat out.

Am I wrong to think this is fishy? Blogs that have written about the guy seem to disappear with site apologies (this page has been removed...) He may be a very evil guy, but with no criminal record and natural born American and resident status, is it permissible to charge someone with a crime so they won't leave the country because of what you think they could possibly do if they did? Am I in error wondering if this is an al Marri case in the making?

[Feel free to delete this if there is truly a real risk to allowing discussion about him on blog sites and I shouldn't have posted this comment. I will understand.]

Please.

Dkos, along with Huffpo, have been strident in their protection of the "establishment" Dems since '07. I mean, they've been busy rationalizing the Gates re-appointment for a week now.

Today, Kos is against Caroline Kennedy being appointed to Senator for NY (and good for him). But wait a week, after Paterson names her as the "heir" to the seat. It will take him all of about 2 seconds to jump aboard.

Silly question though - where the hell has Sweet Caroline been the last eight years?

But nevermind. She's a Kennedy, a Dem and soon will need some "grassroots" support for her re-election bid in 2012. Everyone please send in 10, 20 or 100 bucks to help her campaign - "we'll need her support so that we can get the troops out of Iraq by 2015."

forgot the smiley for the happy post and if from time somebody would open up his statement

with a light and flattering compliment (like me) kovies letters would be so much easier to digest.

Please, if you're intentionally being Amity's straight man, continue. If you're really getting sucked in by his shtick, continue.

Either way, it's comedy gold.

Some appointments are more important than others. I would expect State, Commerce, NSC, Treasury, EPA, and so on to carry out the policies of the President. The really important appointments are to agencies that are more independent, like the Justice Department and the head of ANY intelligence agency. If the law is violated in either of those two places, or the President's policy is not implemented thoughtfully, the results can be very bad and difficult to remedy. Personally, I would like some really capable people to re-examine the structure of the intelligence agencies. The Directorate of Operations at the CIA is the President's secret army. Should the President HAVE a secret army? Not only are they used for illegal and impolitical operations, they have engaged in operations which were unsupervied by any outside authority. And the DIA supplied a lot of the false information used by Powell at the UN. We all know about the illegal NSA spying.