This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Thursday, December 4, 2008 12:00 AM

Why do Feinstein and Wyden sound much different on the torture issue now?

The two Senators spent the year emphatically insisting that the CIA's interrogators comply with the Army Field Manual. With Democrats in control, they're not so emphatic any longer

Read other letters about this article

  • Thursday, December 4, 2008 08:28 AM

    noncoercive?

    "Senator Ron Wyden of Oregon ... said he would consult with the C.I.A. and approve interrogation techniques that went beyond the Army Field Manual as long as they were 'legal, humane and noncoercive.'"

    Can anyone explain why one would bother implementing noncoercive interrogation techniques that go beyond the Army Field Manual? What's the point? Has the CIA been successful in inventing harsher techniques that are noncoercive? Has the Army been slacking off in this department, and is their field manual not creative enough? WTF?

Most Active Letters Threads

476

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
426

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
210

Is Obama's civil liberties record understandable?

Was it unreasonable to expect him to adhere to his commitments regarding the Constitution?
169

The face of rotted Washington

Evan Bayh demands more debt-financed war - fought by others - while boasting that he's a stern "deficit hawk."
111

How dare you criticize wasteful defense spending!

So you think it's only terrorist-appeasing lefties who are down on Pentagon profligacy? Think again

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon