This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Thursday, December 4, 2008 12:00 AM

Why do Feinstein and Wyden sound much different on the torture issue now?

The two Senators spent the year emphatically insisting that the CIA's interrogators comply with the Army Field Manual. With Democrats in control, they're not so emphatic any longer

Read other letters about this article

  • Thursday, December 4, 2008 10:34 AM

    Glenn

    Sorry, I hadn't seen the update following your call with Wyden's office. And don't worry, I don't for a moment feel that your ire is directed at me!

    I think the point you made about gradual Democrat backtracking resonates more clearly, dropping the demand for the AFM as the sole standard for detainee treatment is a nasty reminder of how the dreadful FISA "compromise" emerged over time.

    Maybe if you have the chance you can get Feinstein's people to explain what she meant by "effectively ban" - to check that it has the same meaning as just plain "ban". And indeed if they plan to stop using the AFM as a benchmark, how exactly they intend to implement the standards they have so vocally advocated.

Most Active Letters Threads

339

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
323

Tough-guy John Bolton, hiding under his bed

As usual, right-wing pseudo-warriors are drowning in extreme cowardice.
154

Phil Carter's resignation from key detainee policy post

Many of the "War on Terror" policies he spent years condemning were ones expressly embraced by Obama.
146

Is Obama's civil liberties record understandable?

Was it unreasonable to expect him to adhere to his commitments regarding the Constitution?
99

Palin, Prejean: Beastly treatment for beauties

The governor turned author must fight what the pageant queen learned: Politics and hotness make strange bedfellows

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon