This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Thursday, December 4, 2008 12:00 AM

Why do Feinstein and Wyden sound much different on the torture issue now?

The two Senators spent the year emphatically insisting that the CIA's interrogators comply with the Army Field Manual. With Democrats in control, they're not so emphatic any longer

Read other letters about this article

  • Thursday, December 4, 2008 05:38 AM

    Mukasey and other "heroes"

    Right on cue, and on message with the "they were only protecting America" line, here is Mukasey yesterday:

    "There is absolutely no evidence that anybody who rendered a legal opinion either with respect to surveillance or with respect to interrogation policy did so for any reason other than to protect the security of the country and in the belief that he or she was doing something lawful," he said.


    "In those circumstances, there is no occasion to consider prosecutions, there is no occasion to consider pardons," Mukasey said.

    Link: http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/N03517147.htm

    Granted, Mukasey never was in a position similar to Feinstein and Wyden from which he is now backtracking; he's had this horrid position from the start. His argument here strikes me as:

    "Your honor, I was told by my attorney that the speed limit in that school zone was 75 mph, not 15 mph, so those deaths are not my fault."

    Going back to the "need for flexibility" regarding the Army Field Manual standards, I was struck recently by a passing mention in Susan Faludi's "The Terror Dream", on page 179, pointing to this observation from Human Rights First. After they first noted the large increase in the number of torture depictions on primetime television, they then make this observation:

    It used to be that only villains on television tortured. Today, “good guy” and heroic American characters torture — and this torture is depicted as necessary, effective and even patriotic.

    Link: http://www.humanrightsfirst.org/us_law/etn/primetime/index.asp#problem

    When did it become heroic to torture detainees? Right after 9/11. From that same link, we see data where the number of torture depictions on primetime had been in the single digits per year in the late 90's, but increased in 2000 to over 100. When I traced the links a bit further, I found from a Christian Science Monitor article in 2002 that the pre-9/11 increase in primetime torture was in programs like CSI, where the torture was carried out by the villian. The two biggest offenders of heroes carrying out torture, Alias and 24, debuted in September (30th) and November, 2001. Isn't it interesting that Hollywood was so well-prepared to pump up the torturer as hero in such a short time?

    Sigh, I guess I'll be making calls to the offices of Feinstein and Wyden today, asking why they are changing their tunes.

Most Active Letters Threads

342

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
323

Tough-guy John Bolton, hiding under his bed

As usual, right-wing pseudo-warriors are drowning in extreme cowardice.
162

Is Obama's civil liberties record understandable?

Was it unreasonable to expect him to adhere to his commitments regarding the Constitution?
154

Phil Carter's resignation from key detainee policy post

Many of the "War on Terror" policies he spent years condemning were ones expressly embraced by Obama.
99

Palin, Prejean: Beastly treatment for beauties

The governor turned author must fight what the pageant queen learned: Politics and hotness make strange bedfellows

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon