This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Thursday, December 4, 2008 12:00 AM

Why do Feinstein and Wyden sound much different on the torture issue now?

The two Senators spent the year emphatically insisting that the CIA's interrogators comply with the Army Field Manual. With Democrats in control, they're not so emphatic any longer

Read other letters about this article

  • Friday, December 5, 2008 09:51 AM

    Switch and Bait on AFM

    The Army Field Manual has an appendix -- Appendix M -- which allows "touchless" forms of torture such as isolation, sleep deprivation, "fear up harsh", and perceptual deprivation. The fact some of these techniques may need "approval" does not change their coercive and inhumane aspect. In fact, they constitute the core coercive program of Guantanamo, now enshrined in the AFM for "enemy combatants".

    Therefore, a portion of the AFM is in violation of Common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions, if not the UN Convention on Torture.

    Glenn, I'm surprised you have not seen this. For all readers, a discussion of these issues, including a discussion with Physicians for Human Rights on this issue, can be found at:

    http://www.neverinournames.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=391 and http://valtinsblog.blogspot.com/2008/02/wages-of-fear-what-waterboarding-debate.html

    Appendix M (and the full AFM) can be read at this link:

    http://www.fas.org/irp/doddir/army/fm2-22-3.pdf

    Don't fall for the bait and switch on the AFM. The CIA may ask for more, but they can live with the AFM as constituted. It is not that far different than the style of psychological torture they developed in the KUBARK interrogation manual, and causes lasting psychological harm to prisoners.

Most Active Letters Threads

426

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
287

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
210

Is Obama's civil liberties record understandable?

Was it unreasonable to expect him to adhere to his commitments regarding the Constitution?
111

How dare you criticize wasteful defense spending!

So you think it's only terrorist-appeasing lefties who are down on Pentagon profligacy? Think again
57

Police to talk to Woods

Early morning crash raises questions, and revives tabloid speculation

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon