http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26643211/
McCaffrey on, no disclaimers, talks about Iraq, and the how bad Afghanistan is getting. Subtext - We need more troops and stuff there! Psssst...I know some guys who can hook the troops up with some killer gear!
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/11/30/AR2008113002217.html
But no mention on WaPo.com of the proceedings in San Francisco today regarding telecom immunity.
"Maddow Watch
Hate to say this, because I am a fan of hers, but this is a big test for Rachel Maddow. Were this any other organization but NBC, this would be right in her wheelhouse. If she stays silent about this, it will be very disappointing.
If she has already addressed it and I just missed it, then my apologies to her.
-- GlennNYC"
Why should she? She cannot bite the hand that feeds her. This is not the Clintons who have always been mince meat for all these hypocrites. Remember the way they fed on Clinton and the so-called his conflict of interest with governments who are contributing huge amount of money for his Charitable foundation doing all it can to stop the twin killers, aids and malaria in Africa? He can no longer seek the aid of governments because his wife is the next SoS and that will be conflict of interest. NBC and NYT have been all over it but not the conflict of interest regarding Gen.McCaffrey ,the news media and his companies profiting from his influence. Who cares about poor africans and others in developing countries?
Much of the initial coverage about Fort Hood turned out to be wrong. Is there anything wrong with that?
The accountability imposed by another country for the CIA's kidnapping and torture reveals much about our own.
Fox News' morning show plays to type, talking about whether Muslims in the Army should face "special debriefings"
219 Democrats and one Republican join in favor of the legislation, which passed by a narrow margin
The survivor and author is upset about comparisons some on the right are making to genocide
Salon headlines in your mailbox