It's a disease that permeates the top that includes politicians, pundits, and the press. The blogger Tanta (RIP) said it about those who wrote analysis on financial pages and I think the same can be said here:
"The rest of the time, Tanta liked to chew on the follies of regulators, the idiocies of lenders and — a particular favorite — clueless reporters, which according to her was just about all of them. She did not approve, she once wrote, of “parading one’s ignorance about mortgages in an article full of high-minded tut-tutting over ignorance about mortgages.”
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/01/business/01tanta.html?_r=1
The wagons circle and the Villager's cower behind the carcasses of their dead ideas while their gushing sycophants in the press shoot back at the DFH savages who are attacking with slings and arrows (and the pen).
Much of the initial coverage about Fort Hood turned out to be wrong. Is there anything wrong with that?
The accountability imposed by another country for the CIA's kidnapping and torture reveals much about our own.
Fox News' morning show plays to type, talking about whether Muslims in the Army should face "special debriefings"
The survivor and author is upset about comparisons some on the right are making to genocide
Once seen as a lunatic fringe, reactionary anti-women groups are courting respectability
Salon headlines in your mailbox