This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Friday, November 28, 2008 12:00 AM

Mumbai, the NYT's revisionism, and lessons not learned

The Times' Editorial Page blames the Bush administration for "blessing" the military coup against Hugo Chavez without mentioning that it did the same. Why does that matter?

Read other letters about this article

  • Friday, November 28, 2008 06:08 AM

    When did we make the change?

    I agree with Glenn that this is now the common response to events like terrorist attacks:

    The temptation is great even among the most rational to empower authority to do anything and everything -- without limits -- to punish those responsible and prevent repeat occurrences.

    I can remember a time when the sentiment for such a situation was "Throw the book at them!"

    What a difference that is. The idea was for the perpetrators to suffer the maximum possible punishment, but for that punishment to come from "the book", a euphemism for the law.

    Now, the punishment (along with the procedures for convicting and sentencing) called for by "the book" are simply not good enough and we must go further. This quite literally true with regard to one book, the US Army Field Manual, that lays out in detail what is and what is not allowed in interrogation.

    Imagine the alternative universe where a President Gore "threw the book" at al Qaeda. Or one where the citizens and press of the United States insisted that President Bush operate "by the book" in his efforts.

    Is the willingness to throw away "the book" what they really mean when "patriots" say that "everything changed after 9/11"?

Most Active Letters Threads

405

I'm thankful I'm not President Obama

Backers deride Katrina-style negligence, haters hate him more each day. Can this presidency be saved? Of course
321

Tough-guy John Bolton, hiding under his bed

As usual, right-wing pseudo-warriors are drowning in extreme cowardice.
320

Greg Craig and Obama's worsening civil liberties record

A new Time account of the fall of Obama's White House counsel sheds much light on rule of law issues.
171

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
154

Phil Carter's resignation from key detainee policy post

Many of the "War on Terror" policies he spent years condemning were ones expressly embraced by Obama.

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon