This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Friday, November 28, 2008 12:00 AM

Mumbai, the NYT's revisionism, and lessons not learned

The Times' Editorial Page blames the Bush administration for "blessing" the military coup against Hugo Chavez without mentioning that it did the same. Why does that matter?

Read other letters about this article

  • Friday, November 28, 2008 09:20 AM

    @wbg

    Well, you and are differ considerably.

    Far better, I believe, to have necessary and appropriate measures in place, and not to "let the terrorists win" via a post-trauma knee-jerk reaction.

    That's leaving aside issues of the effectiveness of and necessity for the "extreme measures", the shifting of the security/civil liberties balance which occurs, the alleged "temporary" nature, the arguably ILLEGAL nature of such measures (inasmuch as they disregard existing legal frameworks) etc.

    I could probably come up w/ a few more, but that's off the top of my head, and I'm sure you see my point.

Most Active Letters Threads

639

Obama's exceedingly familiar justifications for escalation

The "new" approach to Afghanistan touted by White House officials seems quite old
543

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
437

The face of rotted Washington

Evan Bayh demands more debt-financed war - fought by others - while boasting that he's a stern "deficit hawk."
206

Bigotry wins in Switzerland

By voting to ban the construction of minarets, Switzerland apes the most extreme intolerance in the Muslim world
148

Mike Huckabee's fatally bad judgment

Brutality by another Huck-pardoned criminal suggests the 2012 GOP hopeful listened more to pastors than prosecutors

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon