This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Friday, November 28, 2008 12:00 AM

Mumbai, the NYT's revisionism, and lessons not learned

The Times' Editorial Page blames the Bush administration for "blessing" the military coup against Hugo Chavez without mentioning that it did the same. Why does that matter?

Read other letters about this article

  • Friday, November 28, 2008 12:19 PM

    GG

    heru-ur/omooex

    Can we just recognize now that nothing constructive will come of continuing this exchange and agree to cease now?

    -- GlennGreenwald

    I agree, and I agreed on that point a long time ago, and asked that the other fellow never address me and that I would return the favor. This seems the best course.

    Over the course of the last several threads, I think I have posted on topic or at least with substantial comments. I do not think the other fellow can say the same. He has only been after starting a dust-up so as to cause this very conversation.

    As you yourself have seen, to not engage him is to be a continual target one's self. Hence, I think you will have to ban one or the other of us --- both, most likely.

    I am not going to be a target. I will not address him other than to respond to attacks. What will *you* do?

Most Active Letters Threads

499

Do Obama officials know what his Afghanistan plan is?

What explains the completely contradictory statements from key aides on a central plank of the war strategy?
408

America's regression

It's almost impossible to find a nation with as many torture advocates as the U.S. has.
332

Palin: Birthers have "fair question" about Obama

Of Obama birth, the ex-governor says, "the public is still, rightfully, making it an issue" (Updated)
121

Is my kids making me not smart?

Stay-at-home fatherhood dulls my intellect to a nub. Excuse me while I ponder the subtext of "Hippos Go Berserk"
120

Trig, the anti-abortion straw baby

Sarah Palin's son is being used to demonize pro-choicers

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon