Read other letters about this article

• Friday, November 21, 2008 01:46 PM

  @ehillesum

  I'm assuming that since you never attempted to address the way the Bush Administration has been treating journalists, and instead chose to write an utterly vacuous USA! USA! chant, is your way of saying you can't handle the notion being discussed here. That is your weakness, nobody else's.

  Mr. Greenwald, the notion that the persecution of journalists in the US (which at its most severe means forcing them to drink coffee from a diner rather than Starbucks) is comparable to persecution in Zimbabwe, etc., is not only ridiculous, it is offensive and, ultimately, a threat to Democracy.

  We imprisoned a journalist for no other reason but we didn't like what he was reporting, we held him for 6 years in Gitmo and tortured him, while occasionally bombing the media outlet he sometimes represents. But since you can't handle this fact, you instead need to believe we deprived him of his lattes. Good luck with that. Meanwhile, to those who occupy reality, it's hard not to see the direct comparison between the case of Sami Al-Haj and the cases in Zimbabwe, Afghanistan and Cuba. To try and erase this comparison by using an entirely separate set of facts (just replace "torture" with "no lattes") isn't going to convince anyone who is sane.

  Why is it that liberals, who love nuanced John Kerrys and despise simplistic Sarah Palins, absolutely fail to take a nuanced approach when comparing the evil of the US government to the evil in other nations?

  So...what is that nuanced approach that compels us to imprison and torture journalists because they're saying things in the media that we don't like? I'm all ears.

  —paulpsd7 Read paulpsd7's other letters
  Permalink
  Flag
  Click "Submit Flag" if you feel this post is inappropriate. Explain why below if you wish.

  Cancel