This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Thursday, November 20, 2008 12:00 AM

Five detainees ordered released "forthwith" after seven years at Guantanamo

If the U.S. Congress had its way, these men would continue to be imprisoned despite there being no evidence of their guilt.

Read other letters about this article

  • Thursday, November 20, 2008 05:47 PM

    Meanwhile, the Bush Administration is mounting a "multi-faceted attack" to delay all the other habeas cases and to get all the other habeas cases REMOVED from the jurisdiction of federal district judges

    AFP:

    http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5gWFoE2jjFp5p3qqVaPzEIfuIKuFQ

    US seeks to modify rules governing Guantanamo appeals process

    * * * * *

    Lyle Denniston:

    http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/sweeping-challenge-to-detainee-process/

    Sweeping challenge to detainee process
    Tuesday, November 18th, 2008 11:07 pm | Lyle Denniston

    If the 113 cases involving some 200 prisoners have to go forward first in District Court, the new filing said, that could produce an “entirely unwarranted” situation of reverses on appeal “months from now” and “only after volumes of classified information have been unnnecessarily disclosed.”

    As an alternative — and apparently the preferred step — the Department suggested that the case be sent immediately to the D.C. Circuit Court to consider quickly the sweeping challenge.

    The multi-faceted attack on the system of District Court habeas review [...] had a close parallel in the government’s attempts to pare down another form of civilian court review of detention decisions under the Detainee Treatment Act of 2005. The latter effort, however, has foundered, and now the government is seeking to shut down the DTA process altogether, leaving only the habeas cases. (The new filing recycled some of the documents submitted to courts during the challenges to the DTA system.)

    The new filing came in four parts: first, a motion to clarify and reconsider key parts of a Nov. 6 “case management order” issued by Senior District Judge Thomas F. Hogan or, in the alternative, a motion to send the case to the Circuit Court along with a delay of specific parts of the Hogan order, second, a set of proposed orders; third, a series of sworn statements by Pentagon and intelligence officials on the risks to national security; and, fourth, a sworn statement on national security risks by FBI Director Robert S. Mueller. Also filed, but not made public, were secret statements from intelligence and military officials.

    [...]

    - - Lyle Denniston

Most Active Letters Threads

740

The commendably missing element from Obama's speech

There was no pretense that human rights is our goal, or the likely outcome, in escalating the war
396

Do Obama officials know what his Afghanistan plan is?

What explains the completely contradictory statements from key aides on a central plank of the war strategy?
389

America's regression

It's almost impossible to find a nation with as many torture advocates as the U.S. has.
310

Palin: Birthers have "fair question" about Obama

Of Obama birth, the ex-governor says, "the public is still, rightfully, making it an issue" (Updated)
211

The poster boy for progressive self-delusion

Read Hayden's 2008 Obama endorsement to remember the way the left sold our centrist president to itself

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon