Read other letters about this article
Attempts to criticize a lawyer for representing unsavory or even evil clients are inherently illegitimate and wrong -- period.
I think there should be a distinction drawn between criticizing an individual lawyer for her or his judgment in taking on a particular case where that judgment is relevant - and a blanket statement that "bad" people don't deserve representation.
I'd like to give Omar a shot at confirming/denying that he agrees with the second premise. Cause that would be "inherently... wrong" in my humble opinion. Otherwise, I think you may be arguing past each other.
Which has never happened in Salon Letters before.