This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Wednesday, November 19, 2008 12:00 AM

Preliminary facts and thoughts about Eric Holder

Is Obama's likely nominee for Attorney General an encouraging sign for advocates of the Constitution and the rule of law?
Glenn Greenwald

Read other letters about this article

  • Thursday, November 20, 2008 05:18 AM

    Hans

    You've made no attempt to show that the GCs don't cover "terrorism." You simply stated it.

    Care to address that? The whole argument against your position is that the administration tried to invent a new category to circumvent the GCs.

    The GCs don't mention cannibalistic Canadians, do they? New category!

    —Baldie McEagle Read Baldie McEagle's other letters

    Flag
Read other letters about this article

Most Active Letters Threads

738

The commendably missing element from Obama's speech

There was no pretense that human rights is our goal, or the likely outcome, in escalating the war
Glenn Greenwald Read article
688

Obama's exceedingly familiar justifications for escalation

The "new" approach to Afghanistan touted by White House officials seems quite old
Glenn Greenwald Read article
356

America's regression

It's almost impossible to find a nation with as many torture advocates as the U.S. has.
Glenn Greenwald Read article
329

Yes, it's Obama's war now

An uninspiring speech sells a dubious policy, but progressives who feel betrayed have only themselves to blame
Joan Walsh Read article
212

Palin: Birthers have "fair question" about Obama

Of Obama birth, the ex-governor says, "the public is still, rightfully, making it an issue" (Updated)
Alex Koppelman Read article

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon