This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Tuesday, November 18, 2008 12:00 AM

Has there been too much bipartisanship or too little?

The reward Joe Lieberman will receive today is justified by the claimed need for more bipartisanship harmony. Is it even possible to have more than we have now?

Read other letters about this article

  • Tuesday, November 18, 2008 11:39 AM

    In calling various Senate offices to express my displeasure

    the phrasing I had been searching for finally came to me:

    Joe Lieberman stands for everything the American public just voted overwhelmingly against.

    I also had some fun calling the Homeland Security and Government Oversight Committee office. I asked when we would see the schedule for the hearings Lieberman obviously had to promise to hold in order to keep his chairmanship. I was informed that the schedule is not published until the new session starts. I told them they'd better get busy, since he's done nothing for the last two years. I was informed that the committee has been quite busy. Gosh, could have fooled me...

Most Active Letters Threads

444

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
426

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
210

Is Obama's civil liberties record understandable?

Was it unreasonable to expect him to adhere to his commitments regarding the Constitution?
111

How dare you criticize wasteful defense spending!

So you think it's only terrorist-appeasing lefties who are down on Pentagon profligacy? Think again
68

The face of rotted Washington

Evan Bayh demands more debt-financed war - fought by others - while boasting that he's a stern "deficit hawk."

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon