This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Tuesday, November 18, 2008 12:00 AM

Has there been too much bipartisanship or too little?

The reward Joe Lieberman will receive today is justified by the claimed need for more bipartisanship harmony. Is it even possible to have more than we have now?

Read other letters about this article

  • Tuesday, November 18, 2008 01:13 PM

    It can be two things

    I don't think that anyone can seriously claim that we've witnessed bipartisan politics over these last 8 years. Examples of partisanship are many but the most glaring would be the Justice Department purges of early 2007 (this fits into a larger pattern of politicization of the bureaucracy) and the record breaking number filibusters in the 110th Congress. Furthermore, with people like Dick Cheney, Karl Rove, and Tom Delay throwing their weight around how can this era be described as bipartisan?

    I'm going to go out on a limb here and suggest that we've had both extraordinary partisanship and extraordinary bipartisanship over the last 8 years. The Republicans have been extremely partisan and the Democrats have been extremely bipartisan. I know how "partisan" it sounds to say that but the facts are there in abundance. Republicans have gotten even their most unbalanced proposals passed and the Democrats have found all but a very few of their proposals blocked. This trend can be found from legislation to appointments.

    If you reevaluate Obama's message with this in mind, bipartisan change means that the partisanship of the Republicans will no longer dominate politics. Instead, the spirit of bipartisanship that the Democrats have amply shown in supporting the extreme and dangerous policies of the president despite the protestations of their constituents will take center stage. We will move from having a radical right wing government to having a conservative centrist government (conservative meaning resistant to policy change).

Most Active Letters Threads

685

Obama's exceedingly familiar justifications for escalation

The "new" approach to Afghanistan touted by White House officials seems quite old
612

The commendably missing element from Obama's speech

There was no pretense that human rights is our goal, or the likely outcome, in escalating the war
440

The face of rotted Washington

Evan Bayh demands more debt-financed war - fought by others - while boasting that he's a stern "deficit hawk."
317

Yes, it's Obama's war now

An uninspiring speech sells a dubious policy, but progressives who feel betrayed have only themselves to blame
209

Bigotry wins in Switzerland

By voting to ban the construction of minarets, Switzerland apes the most extreme intolerance in the Muslim world

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon