This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Tuesday, November 18, 2008 12:00 AM

Has there been too much bipartisanship or too little?

The reward Joe Lieberman will receive today is justified by the claimed need for more bipartisanship harmony. Is it even possible to have more than we have now?

Read other letters about this article

  • Tuesday, November 18, 2008 08:08 AM

    Bipartisanship Or Submission?

    Answer: submission. Bipartisanship would mean that half the time the Democrats got their way on important issues. Instead we get jack shit.

    And why should I value bipartisanship anyway? Of the two parties, there is one that is filled with anti-American lawless extremist monsters. I don't want anything to do with those scum and certainly don't want to donate to the extremists what they couldn't win at the ballot box. If they want their policies passed let them do it the old-fashioned way: win the election and pass your program.

    Bipartisanship destroys democracy. The people are given a choice and they voted for the party they prefer. They didn't choose a "biparty". The two party system already waters down that choice by forcing candidates to move to the center in search of the median voter. What's more, we know that voters' true position on the issues is way to the LEFT of where things stand now and way to the LEFT of what the cowards in Congress are willing to fight for -- and of course WAY WAY WAY to the left of what the Republican extremists want. Going half way toward the Reublicans is moving in the wrong direction -- if you care about the will of the people anyway.

    Bipartisanship is anti-democratic and has no justification. And of course that is doubly true when, as we all know, bipartisanship really means the Republican extremists get their way, rather than the Democrats getting their way half the time or getting half a loaf.

    Bipartisanship is for submissive Republican and Village bootlickers looking for a way to mask their cowardice.

Most Active Letters Threads

465

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
426

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
210

Is Obama's civil liberties record understandable?

Was it unreasonable to expect him to adhere to his commitments regarding the Constitution?
131

The face of rotted Washington

Evan Bayh demands more debt-financed war - fought by others - while boasting that he's a stern "deficit hawk."
111

How dare you criticize wasteful defense spending!

So you think it's only terrorist-appeasing lefties who are down on Pentagon profligacy? Think again

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon