This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Wednesday, November 5, 2008 12:00 AM

Voting machine fraud, pollster bias and the Bradley effect

Tuesday's results provide compelling empirical evidence negating several popular voting theories.

Read other letters about this article

  • Wednesday, November 5, 2008 06:11 AM

    underestimating Obama

    Re Mike Sulzer's comment about the bias in the polls. I think the guys at fivethirtyeight discussed the problem that pollsters have accounting for the fact that many people no longer have landline phones and are being missed by traditional polling. A lot of cell phone-only people are young, more likely pro-Obama.

Most Active Letters Threads

434

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
426

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
210

Is Obama's civil liberties record understandable?

Was it unreasonable to expect him to adhere to his commitments regarding the Constitution?
111

How dare you criticize wasteful defense spending!

So you think it's only terrorist-appeasing lefties who are down on Pentagon profligacy? Think again
61

Police to talk to Woods

Early morning crash raises questions, and revives tabloid speculation

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon