This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Sunday, October 5, 2008 12:00 AM

Porn producer invokes the Bush/Yoo defense -- unsuccessfully

Citizens who produce fictitious films depicting "humiliation" and "degradation" will be sent to prison. Government officials who do that in reality will be immunized.

Read other letters about this article

  • Sunday, October 5, 2008 05:19 PM

    I am curious about what people see as the difference between 18 and 17.

    Leaving the law aside and dealing only with what is right and what is wrong (because morality and laws don't always match), why would it not be okay for ole Max to have girls 16 and 17 in his films since they would more likely match the childlike look he is shooting for. More cellulite after 18, if you know what I mean?

    Would people be cool with that? Should we lower the age at which people can appear in such films to 16? Or maybe 14? Or maybe 12?

    Glenn mentions consenting adults, but a girl who is one day short of 18 is illegal and a girl who is 18 is legal.

Most Active Letters Threads

465

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
426

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
210

Is Obama's civil liberties record understandable?

Was it unreasonable to expect him to adhere to his commitments regarding the Constitution?
131

The face of rotted Washington

Evan Bayh demands more debt-financed war - fought by others - while boasting that he's a stern "deficit hawk."
111

How dare you criticize wasteful defense spending!

So you think it's only terrorist-appeasing lefties who are down on Pentagon profligacy? Think again

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon