Sometimes I think many, many people don't have a clue what discussions were like on the 'net prior to the advent of the web, back when UseNet was the place to be. They should visit Google groups or the way back machine and peruse some of those.

Like "alt.flame":

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.flame/topics?hl=en

or:

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.karl-malden.nose/topics?hl=en&lnk=sg

or click my sig. ;-)

Cheers,

Like "alt.flame":

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.flame/topics?hl=en

or:

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.karl-malden.nose/topics?hl=en&lnk=sg

Ahhh ... Those were the days my friend!

On a separate note, what's with all the lewrockwell.com links being posted here by Associative WhateverTheHell and his ilk? Seems like the bulk of the newbies here are Loonylibertarians.

LWM, if you read this, get your damn ass in here and help me clean this mess up! Your assistance is needed.

And to "heru-ur" Pedinska has been wayyyyy too nice to you and your hardcore insane views on sex, women, contraception, and abortion. Basically as Arne would say: FOAD ...

KB4Hire (October 6, 2008 01:25 PM ):

LWM, well, he always did play up his Harlan Ellison side - ie didn't suffer fools and assholes easily. BUT his posts were very often funny and full of really interesting and cool links. And as always, if you didn't like his posts, scroll over them for god sakes!

---

Have you tried substituting Bill O'Reilly's scintillating cerebrations for his, KB4Hire, or is O'Reilly too subtle a thinker and sophisticated an interlocutor, compared with LWMauliac? :^)

Have you tried substituting Bill O'Reilly's scintillating cerebrations for his, KB4Hire, or is O'Reilly too subtle a thinker and sophisticated an interlocutor, compared with LWMauliac? :^)

While I may not agree with him sometimes, LWM is far more intelligent, insightful, and knowledgeable that O'Lielly (or Buchanan, or anyone on the right).

Cheers,