This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Wednesday, September 17, 2008 12:00 AM

Key senators dispute FBI's anthrax case against Bruce Ivins

The FBI director faces emphatic doubts about his claims that the anthrax attacker has been identified.

Read other letters about this article

  • Wednesday, September 17, 2008 08:46 AM

    About that review

    The review of the scientific data needs several aspects to it. An independent group of qualified scientists needs:

    • Access to all raw data generated by FBI scientists and scientists doing work for the FBI. Full documentation of methods employed and all results are needed for the review to be valid.
    • The review group needs to have the opportunity to interview the scientists both inside and outside the FBI to find out if the reports emanating from DOJ match the results they generated.
    • The review group needs access to RMR 1029, the actual attack material from the Leahy and Daschle letters and reference samples of both non-weaponized and weaponized material from Dugway and South Jefferson so that they can carry out their own independent analysis to confirm the results obtained by and for the FBI. Reference material from any other facility capable of producing the material also should be submitted should a miracle occur and Mueller actually name additional facilities after the break.

    As suggested by Glenn, this scientific work should be carried in parallel with, and coordinated with, an independent evaluation of all other evidence generated in the case.

Most Active Letters Threads

377

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
206

Is Obama's civil liberties record understandable?

Was it unreasonable to expect him to adhere to his commitments regarding the Constitution?
132

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
108

How dare you criticize wasteful defense spending!

So you think it's only terrorist-appeasing lefties who are down on Pentagon profligacy? Think again
55

Police to talk to Woods

Early morning crash raises questions, and revives tabloid speculation

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon