Letters posted here are associated with the following article:
The letters thread is now closed.
My apologies for not knowing where this comes from: "11. Are you offended by the phrase “Under God” in the Pledge of Allegiance? Why or why not?
Palin: "Not on your life. If it was good enough for the founding fathers, its good enough for me and I’ll fight in defense of our Pledge of Allegiance."
Do you have a link to the article where this is quoted? It's a gem and I just had to laugh. I doubt there are two more ignorant people ever to have run for higher office. If you have the time I'd love to know the source.
I'm an independent with no intention of voting for Obama, since I can't condone the selling out of my Fourth Amendment rights for corporate political gain. It would have been smarter for him, in my view, to have stood up to the corporate machine, and shown them that he would not govern as a sell-out. That having been said, here's a few insights from outside the fray.
1) If what I think is a beautifully-crafted Rovian move (and therefore despicably immoral) is in fact the case, then the Democrats are going to have to work extra hard to get the voter turnout. She's thrown out enough key phrases to send a signal to the ~30% of voters who vote along those lines to turn out for the McCain/Palin ticket. Given voter turnout over the last several decades, that is going to be a hard group to overcome. They only need about 26% to actually show up to ensure a victory. People need to turn out in large numbers this November. Very, very large numbers. If more than 60% of the electorate shows up I would be very, very surprised.
2) Protesters would be far more effective if they all dressed up in black and goose-stepped their way through the streets to mock the law-'enforcement' thugs that have been on display this week. I've been against the paramilitarization of our police forces since the 80s, when the War on Drugs first started providing them with the rationales for 'Army'-fying our guardians of the peace. Besides, what kinds of laws do we have that they need to be 'enforced' on the populace? Mockery and scorn are far more effective than anarchic destruction. Citizens also need to be a bit more vocal with the boos when cops start going overboard with the pepper spray.
3) Did I mention that the Democrats are going to need a really significant voter turnout if they hope to win?
4) Don't go the attack route. The smart folks have always known that the core Republicans are mean-spirited individuals, and prone to bad behavior. The better route would be to show that the Obama team is thinking through the issues and how to address them. Talking through the problems and how to overcome them with the American populace. Of course, part of the exploration might involve raising Republican solutions (when they actually offer anything other than faith) and showing why they would ultimately be harmful to the citizenry.
5) Don't worry, I'm not voting for McCain. I consider his policies (a consideration cemented by the choice of Palin) to be the same ones that have allowed the wholesale looting of this country by monied interests. There's no way that I can support that. I have nothing but opprobrium for the Republicans and what they have done to this nation so that they could prosper. I am a Gen Xer who is really pissed off at the mess I'm going to have to help clean up. It looks like I'm going to have to swallow my bile and vote for Barr.
6) Hillary Clinton now has an opportunity to demonstrate that she cares about more than herself, and to serve the Democratic Party by carefully dissecting Ms. Palin in her own special way. Mr. Clinton needs to either shut up or do an international goodwill tour (openly supporting the Obama candidacy the whole way), but I think we're pretty tired of him here.
7) Avoid the name calling. It's embarrassing to everyone but Republicans, who seem to revel in slinging pejoratives around. It's a crappy debate strategy, and the less folks do it, the more its ridiculousness will be revealed.
8) Hillary can also help get out the vote with certain 'communities' who are typically under-represented. Realize that the larger the disparity in vote totals between Democratic and Republican results, the greater the international perception of a repudiation of the policies of the past two terms, not just a pushing out of office. Anything less will leave our international friends wondering about us nervously. This means that the Democrats need to work extra hard to get the vote out.
should be the two fronts on which the Democrats blitzkrieg the fascists. Bring out in the open McCain's years of corruption, starting even before the Keating 5-there's plenty of evidence there, but the Dems keep praising him as honorable and a great patriot, both are untrue and only help perpetuate his false image. Keep emphasizing that he would be the most extreme and militaristic president in US history, compared to McCain, Bush and Reagan should be considered as relative moderates. He would initiate wars and military conflicts Bush wouldn't have dared start. McCain would love to invade Sweden-too many Swedes oppose the Iraq invasion. No attacks on family-the Palin family and Cindy McCain are plenty grotesque without the Democrats going after them and Democrats don't do that kind of stuff anyway, that's Rove's territory.
You are in a comfy chair when you do your job, asshat.
It doesn't even involve fighting anymore. You are all prima donnas who commute to work and commute back to base to an even more posh setting. Good chow, nice hot showers. I don't care if you are in the air force or in the navy with the Village People. If you were a ground pounder I might have a modicum of respect for you. Personally, I doubt you were ever a pilot. You look too fat.
Obama professes to care for the "poor people" while looking down his nose at them and, by the way, totally misunderstanding them.
So? Pubs have been screwing the poor and blaming the Democrats for it for years.
Got any fresh propaganda scams?