Read other letters about this article
http://www.startribune.com/local/27703754.html?page=2&c=y
all these brilliant Salon writers: do more
write the Star Tribune or other newspapers of the area, and be intelligent, direct, clever,
and expose your reactions to what has happened...
dont let the ones who like Raids, panty raids, activist raids, roach raids, whatever .... those who agree with the Sheriff dont let them be the only ones read on those Minneapolis websites without a response from us !
please, take your comments to the sources where those who live in the area, perhaps, can see there are other smart reactive responders, first or fourth responders, to
share our views of their Police excesses.
Dont vent, just be the fascinating writers I see here on Salon, but take it to those streets...it might help just a bit more...
*exposure*... of opinions that have a reasonable side instead of their side = fear of activists or loud disrupters [no crime].
We love to write/talk to ourselves and form these locked-in enclaves for safety. So this is another good time to expand into letter- writing elsewhere too.... briefly, politely, not attacking or insulting, but saying we shall be heard or read in their cities as well. Flood their lines with honest
reactions to the over-use of infiltration & force on those who have committed no serious crimes.
And can someone who knows tell us the legal criteria for "incite to violence" ?
what is actually required for such a label, accusation to be made or branded upon a person ?
Collecting weapons [most vets have at least a few in their homes ], having various cutting tools [most American houses and garages are cluttered with them], having a website that says some people dream of being powerful disrupters [ask your manly friends what they dream about beyond sex ]...
what has to proven to assume there is danger and that inciting is a negative dangerous act ? Anyone care to share ?
exposure of our smart letters here can be taken outside of our safety zone. wanna ?