This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Monday, August 18, 2008 12:00 AM

Doubts over the anthrax case intensify -- except among much of the media

While most independent observers express increasing skepticism over the FBI's case against Bruce Ivins, the establishment media uncritically amplifies those claims

Read other letters about this article

  • Monday, August 18, 2008 07:20 AM

    Don't the reporters watch TV?

    Every crime drama on the tube covers evidence gathering and what constitutes a solid case. I recommend a few DVD's of CSI for each reporter before stenographing the government's theories.

    The Quinn Martin dramas of the 1970s covered holes in the plot by showing you who did it and why at the beginning so you were ahead of the detective as you watched him catch up and you didn't wonder what prompted him to pursue that particular clue.

    So we need less Barnaby Jones and more Gil Grissom in the newsroom.

Most Active Letters Threads

725

The commendably missing element from Obama's speech

There was no pretense that human rights is our goal, or the likely outcome, in escalating the war
688

Obama's exceedingly familiar justifications for escalation

The "new" approach to Afghanistan touted by White House officials seems quite old
329

Yes, it's Obama's war now

An uninspiring speech sells a dubious policy, but progressives who feel betrayed have only themselves to blame
256

America's regression

It's almost impossible to find a nation with as many torture advocates as the U.S. has.
183

The poster boy for progressive self-delusion

Read Hayden's 2008 Obama endorsement to remember the way the left sold our centrist president to itself

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon