The new age advertisment Leonard G. Horowitz's website. Unless I have him mistaken with another water peddling new age wingnut dentist.

-- omooex

You sound just like me!

heru-ur/bucky1, take note!

Just trying to lighten the mood.

Gallows humor and irreverent black humor is the most prevalent kind in any cop shop.

Now you guys get back to work. This still smells like 3 day old fish but that could just be incompetence and bungling, the real legacy of the Bush administration.

I am only an egg, but perhaps he wants to share water and get closer?

:-0

For those of you with the eyes to see, and the ears to hear, I have put together a site that provides an interesting overview of the unfolding events of Revelation 12

Those who have done the research know that the underbelly of the Illuminati is satanism. This is why they censored the extraordinary eruption of Comet Holmes in October. There are pictures and further info explaining this monumental event at the site, under the "signs" button.

Go to "links" button for the astounding revelations last week from former Nasa official Clark McClelland, who supported astronaut Ed Mitchell's recent comments regarding military involvement with alien races.

McClelland has admitted to seeing a 8 t0 9 ft tall alien on his monitor who was in the shuttle cargo bay during a classified shuttle mission. This week Clark put a artist's rendering on his website of what he witnessed. Be sure to read the "incidents" links and you will get a pretty good idea of how credible of a witness Clark really is.

I will posting further info on the site in a couple of days that is going to shock you.

http:www.thetruthportal.com

from all of their documents.

A debate over squalene is at issue here? Here is a description

of the use of squaleen from the world health organization.

http://www.who.int/vaccine_safety/topics/adjuvants/squalene/questions_and_answers/en/index.html

I may have missed it, but I havn't seen anything realted to adjuvants in Ivins' research. If so, so what? Investigating the use of save wideley used adjuvants would have been the responsible thing to do in his postition.

No better way to hid real brilliance or expertise than behind a show of "incompetence and bungling" as in Hogan's Heroes or many other examples. Perhaps the FBI looks like the Keystone Cops because they are not really trying to get to the ultimate truth. Much like a local sheriff in a rural area with an election approaching and a sensational murder to solve: any conviction is a good conviction.

Here's a cliche for you, and then I'm done with responses to either of you.

You can lead a horse to water (seeing as how you are tittering so much about H2O) but you can't make him drink.

The article I linked to is comprehensive and damning. You wouldn't want to lead anyone away from the water, would you?

Please stop telling people that they shouldn't go look at anything by certain posters (e.g. Fanzone). But if you have anything to comment about the facts in the article I linked to, please post it. Hint: Read the article first. I'll put the link in my sig just for you, one more time.

Thank you.

... last week from former Nasa official Clark McClelland, who supported astronaut Ed Mitchell's recent comments regarding military involvement with alien races." --Mark0101

Look this is a classy comments section; leave the "big-eyed-bug screwing" out of it!

Hm...the New York Times, a week before 9/11, ran a story about how the US had a program to make weaponized anthrax...

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9E02E1D71639F937A3575AC0A9679C8B63&sec=health&spon=&pagewanted=all

Sorry, nothing personal and I did not intend to offend. However, with so much to read on this issue, I do (and I imagine others do too) need a way of filtering. The last thing on my list will be the article by Leonard Horowitz, Dentist and Water Wizard. Perhaps you can find something similar by a more respected source who has at least some serious background on the issues and is not squandering their reputation on new age health remedies.

You wrote: "There is no conceivable way to read Ivins' remarks about the ´Christian Nation Express´ or Judaism as ironic or sarcastic, unless you think the Frederick News-Post would post a raw antisemitic letter."

The principal clause in your sentence is manifestly false. There is a way, not just a "conceivable way" but a common-sensical way to understand at least one of those letters as sarcastic ("ironic" won´t fly). Any sentence whatever can be treated as straightforward or sarcastic. The choice will depend on the verbal context, the situational context, the speaker, etc. No utterance whatever (even this one) is immune from a sarcastic reading--or a straightforward reading.

The dependent clause of your sentence asks us to trust the exquisite judgment of some kid handling the Frederick News Press letters-to-the editor section on that particular afternoon. If it is difficult for us here on Glenn´s thread to distinguish between the straightforward and the sarcastic, how difficult must it have been for that poor young person, who probably finished somewhere in the McCain level of his or her high-school class, and whose only instructions were probably to dial a telephone number and ask whether the respondent really sent the letter?

And how many of those wacky Xian-Zionists register as Democrats and vote in Democratic primaries, year after year, as Ivins did?

There is no, no, no, NO trustable evidence in any of these documents that Ivins was some sort of wacky Christian-Zionist End-Times nut. No reliable evidence. Nut he may have been. But this particular kind of nut...not so fast.

I read the whole thing, and just finished a minute ago or so. It is a damn long read, and there is a lot of information there. It was worth my time.

He asks some good questions, but he is a little over the top at times. Don't you agree?

After a long history going back into the 20s, he asks a pertinent question. Something like: can you see that the international military/industrial/banking/moneyed complex may have had a hand in the anthrax killings.

Yes, I can give credit to that as a hypothesis. But, it will take a lot of proving to include all the players he did into a conspiracy. A hell of a lot of proving. Did I mention a hell of a lot of proving?

On the other hand, I have noticed that many players that benefited from the anthrax hysteria never got a close look as fas as I know. I'll give you that.