Read other letters about this article
Yup, I just saw that, where the hours Ivins worked was. Commenter j.willow notices another:
The case seems to disappear the more it's examined. Take this for example:http://www.usdoj.gov/amerithrax/08-430SWAffidavit07524.pdf
There are plenty of misrepresentations and red herrings. But by far the worst is this one:
"Dr. Bruce Ivins .. has been the sole custodian of RMR-1029 since it was grown in 1997."
One page later:
"Of the sixteen domestic laboratories that had virulent RMR-1029..."
Either RMR-1029 was in sixteen known places in Sept 2001, or it was in one. Period.
In fact, the only interesting piece of evidence is the chart of Ivins late working sessions during September 2001. That's it.
-- jwillow
Now, how does that 16 into 1 work out?