Read other letters about this article
when it appeared that it was indeed a game of "telephone" in which all the reporters were working off the same "source documents" and each other's published reports ... adding in whatever tiny nuggets of "independently gathered" info as they could scrounge.
Very hard to keep track of what's already been replaced by other information, though it seems no one has done much in the way of actually retracting information. Interesting how much of the "damning" info is from unnamed sources not authorized to speak ... while many of those defending Ivins are named.
quel suprise.