This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Tuesday, August 5, 2008 12:00 AM

The FBI's emerging, leaking case against Ivins

The more revelations there are in the Bruce Ivins case, the more questions there are.

Read other letters about this article

  • Tuesday, August 5, 2008 10:07 AM

    Obvious misconception

    Obvious question...

    We now know that some of the anthrax letters contained a novel, highly-weaponized form of anthrax that originated from a US military laboratory. Ask yourself this question. What's more likely?

    I'll let others more versed in this correct me if I'm wrong but there is some confusion about "weaponized" and "lethality" with respect to the anthrax used in this case. Unless I am mistaken - due to the terrible job the press has done and what seems to be a concerted effort by some quarters to leak bad information into the mix - this anthrax was not "weaponized" but was highly lethal, although it appears it's lethality increased from the first letters to the last.

Most Active Letters Threads

516

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
426

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
397

The face of rotted Washington

Evan Bayh demands more debt-financed war - fought by others - while boasting that he's a stern "deficit hawk."
210

Is Obama's civil liberties record understandable?

Was it unreasonable to expect him to adhere to his commitments regarding the Constitution?
180

Bigotry wins in Switzerland

By voting to ban the construction of minarets, Switzerland apes the most extreme intolerance in the Muslim world

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon