Why mail from Princeton? Perhaps because it is close to Newark airport. Did the FBI check plane rosters/Customs database/auto rentals of people coming and leaving the airport? Look for in and out activity, it would not take too much time to mail some letters.

I think it is faster to drive from Frederick to Princeton than to fly via Newark, and drive to Princeton, especially after 9/11.

It is a minimum of 1 hour 15 minutes from a Washington DC airport (any of them) to Newark by Continental today. Add in the commute time to whichever DC airport. It is an hour's drive from Newark to Princeton.

Google maps gives 3hrs 19 minutes - 194 miles - for Frederick MD to Princeton NJ.

That's how Duley spelled her professional title.

Any questions?

FBI was told to blame Anthrax scare on Al Qaeda by White House officials

BY JAMES GORDON MEEK

DAILY NEWS WASHINGTON BUREAU

Saturday, August 2nd 2008, 6:32 PM

WASHINGTON - In the immediate aftermath of the 2001 anthrax attacks, White House officials repeatedly pressed FBI Director Robert Mueller to prove it was a second-wave assault by Al Qaeda, but investigators ruled that out, the Daily News has learned.

After the Oct. 5, 2001, death from anthrax exposure of Sun photo editor Robert Stevens, Mueller was "beaten up" during President Bush's morning intelligence briefings for not producing proof the killer spores were the handiwork of terrorist mastermind Osama Bin Laden, according to a former aide.

"They really wanted to blame somebody in the Middle East," the retired senior FBI official told The News.

On October 15, 2001, President Bush said, "There may be some possible link" to Bin Laden, adding, "I wouldn't put it past him." Vice President Cheney also said Bin Laden's henchmen were trained "how to deploy and use these kinds of substances, so you start to piece it all together."

But by then the FBI already knew anthrax spilling out of letters addressed to media outlets and to a U.S. senator was a military strain of the bioweapon. "Very quickly [Fort Detrick, Md., experts] told us this was not something some guy in a cave could come up with," the ex-FBI official said. "They couldn't go from box cutters one week to weapons-grade anthrax the next."

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/us_world/2008/08/02/2008-08-02_fbi_was_told_to_blame_anthrax_scare_on_a.html

There are things about the letters that indicate to me it wasn't an Arab and probably not a intel operative with skill in false flag ops so I'm skeptical of rogue elements. If it was, they'd have pulled this off better and not have had to lean on Mueller and "beat him up". I think it was a lone nut. I'm not convinced it was Ivins but he might just be a convenient means of closing it down because it is an embarassment to all involved. Have fun with the masturbatory conspiracy theorizing. I'm going to look at pictures of nekkid women now.

Probably not, but that doesn't exclude busting people who've committed multiple felonies.

Has anyone else come across an allegation that Ivins was urging the investigation of Hatfill? Jonathan Taplin makes this claim in his post today at TalkingPointsMemo but provides no basis for the claim other than a reference to unidentified "very reliable sources."

It seems to me that if Ivins had indeed been urging an investigation of Hatfill that the FBI would know and would be touting this information as further evidence of Ivins' culpability. And yet the FBI, to my knowledge, is not citing Ivins as someone urging an investigation of Hatfill.

Has anyone run across this allegation from any source other than Taplin?

but the document you linked to following that colon showed a $500 fine, with $500 suspended. 500 plus the same 500 is not 1000, it's 500, and it was suspended, so she didn't pay it. Or am I missing something?

Now I see what you mean. It's unclear, but you're probably right- I'll change that.

"Moreover, as America becomes an increasingly multi-cultural society, it may find it more difficult to fashion a consensus on foreign policy issues, except in the circumstance of a truly massive and widely perceived direct external threat." - The Grand Chessboard, Zbigniew Brzezinski, 1997

"Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor."

- Rebuilding Americas Defenses, Report published by PNAC in September, 2000

RUKiddingMe's post hit the nail on the head. Thanks to Sy Hersh, virtually everyone who reads this blog is now aware that Cheney is willing to openly discuss False Flag operations in the White House. False Flag operations that would result in dead American soldiers. Over 4000 American troops have been killed in Iraq, and a peer reviewed Lancet Medical Journal survey estimates 655,000 Iraqis have died as a result of this war. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/6495753.stm

So, we all suspect massive treachery from this administration, yet questioning the 9/11 myth remains a taboo topic.

David Ray Griffin has spoken about how the 9/11 Myth was consecrated at the National Cathedral on Sept. 14 in NYC. It is essentially blasphemous to question any elements of the official story. The growing number of credible, outspoken Americans, and international citizens who question the official story is completely censored in the M$M, and anyone who asks fundamental questions...like PeakDavid...are ridiculed as "kooks". Great post by the way PeakDavid.

To PeakDavid's point on WTC7...here's a nice illustration.

"The observed collapse time of WTC 7 [610 feet tall, 47 stories, and not hit by an airplane] was 6.5 seconds. That is only half a second longer than it would have taken for the top of the building to fall to the ground in a vacuum, and half a second shorter than the falling time of an apple when air resistance is taken into account… The great speed of the collapse and the low value of the resistance factor strongly suggest controlled demolition."

— Heikki Kurttila, D.Sc. (Doctor of Technology, Finland), Safety Engineer and Accident Analyst, National Safety Technology Authority (TUKES), Finland. Specialist in the investigation of pressure vessel explosion accidents and the impacts of the shock waves caused by them.

Glenn, this attempt to uncover this propaganda campaign surrounding the anthrax attacks is the tip of the iceberg.

Keep digging, and be careful.