This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Monday, August 4, 2008 12:00 AM

Additional key facts re: the anthrax investigation

The media's key witness as to the psychological state of Bruce Ivins -- Jean Carol Duley -- has a lengthy history that undermines her credibility.

Read other letters about this article

  • Monday, August 4, 2008 05:25 AM

    This was beneath you, Glenn.

    "None of this is to defend Ivins, nor is to suggest that this constitutes evidence that Duley is lying or is otherwise inaccurate in her claims."

    Then what was it?

    Bringing up her drunk driving record? You're purposefully undermining her character with unrelated information. Shame on you, Glenn.

    All these folks whose impressions of Ivins differ from Duley's? How well do the people at your church know you? Well enough to say hi after Mass and ask how you like the new car? How well do most of your neighbors know you? Would they be on the television saying "He's a nice quiet man, kept to himself.".

    I agree that the source of the bentonite story needs to come out. But as for the attack on Duley's character, shame shame shame on you.

Most Active Letters Threads

740

The commendably missing element from Obama's speech

There was no pretense that human rights is our goal, or the likely outcome, in escalating the war
688

Obama's exceedingly familiar justifications for escalation

The "new" approach to Afghanistan touted by White House officials seems quite old
370

America's regression

It's almost impossible to find a nation with as many torture advocates as the U.S. has.
329

Yes, it's Obama's war now

An uninspiring speech sells a dubious policy, but progressives who feel betrayed have only themselves to blame
322

Do Obama officials know what his Afghanistan plan is?

What explains the completely contradictory statements from key aides on a central plank of the war strategy?

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon