This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Sunday, August 3, 2008 12:00 AM

Journalists, their lying sources, and the anthrax investigation

The death of Bruce Ivins raises far more questions than it answers

Read other letters about this article

  • Sunday, August 3, 2008 09:17 AM

    Inferences

    When the anthrax attacks hit, the Democrats went running for cover and demanded answers, because they knew they were being targeted.

    The Republicans, by contrast, went quietly about their business, because they knew they were not.

    There's only one dot to connect here, people.

Most Active Letters Threads

459

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
426

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
210

Is Obama's civil liberties record understandable?

Was it unreasonable to expect him to adhere to his commitments regarding the Constitution?
111

How dare you criticize wasteful defense spending!

So you think it's only terrorist-appeasing lefties who are down on Pentagon profligacy? Think again
101

The face of rotted Washington

Evan Bayh demands more debt-financed war - fought by others - while boasting that he's a stern "deficit hawk."

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon