This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Thursday, July 31, 2008 12:00 AM

A federal court rejects Bush's "executive privilege" claims

A Bush-appointed judge rules that the president's top aides do not have absolute immunity from responding to congressional subpoenas.

Read other letters about this article

  • Thursday, July 31, 2008 11:34 AM

    What's not included.

    It's interesting to me that the Court disclaimed the possibility of requiring the Administration to develop a priv. log. Instead, they supposed to use Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 45 as a guide, which might make for a lower standard. They can just deny the existence of something if they don't have to put it on a priv. log.

Most Active Letters Threads

523

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
427

The face of rotted Washington

Evan Bayh demands more debt-financed war - fought by others - while boasting that he's a stern "deficit hawk."
187

Bigotry wins in Switzerland

By voting to ban the construction of minarets, Switzerland apes the most extreme intolerance in the Muslim world
130

Facebook, the mean girls and me

At 34 years old, I finally feel like a popular seventh-grader. How sad is that?
103

Polanski moves from jail to ski chalet

The rapist director is granted bail, and one of his most vocal apologists celebrates

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon