Letters posted here are associated with the following article:

506
Letters
Thursday, July 10, 2008 12:00 AM

Interview with ACLU re: constitutional challenge to new FISA law

Jameel Jaffer, the Director of the ACLU National Security Project, explains why the new FISA law violates the 4th Amendment and is even broader than the President's illegal NSA program

The letters thread is now closed.

View:
Friday, July 11, 2008 08:01 AM

mangling metaphors

ill wind and whistle past? jeeze. maybe it was the wind generated by whistling or the wind required to whistle. who knows where the association came from.

How about, It's an error to whistle past the place where many of this administration's dead bodies are buried.

Friday, July 11, 2008 08:03 AM

I DON'T CARE!

I should probably stop reading about this on blogs, as I'm the first to admit that I'm not a lawyer...but , as they say, I have friends who are lawyers--and they are appalled. The idea of someone from London being the "point" of the warrant, does not (CAN not) prevent whomever is spying from "becoming aware" of what the "un-point" person is saying! Huh?? Okay, I'm not Ivy League (thank gawd)--but , (esp. with Dubya!such a grand record on protection of civil liberties!!), if it quacks like a duck, walks like a duck, lies and makes war like a traitor, it's probably neo-con, who only wants to [press the point to gain m ore power for the "unitary executive", which only exists in strange peoples' minds--John Yoo , for instance,. And, maybve you. WHY do you want obe be spied on? Do you think the CIA can protect you? The "9/11" terrorists had all over-stayed their VISAs, were reported by the pilots' school as "engaging in odd behavior" (like not weanting to learn how to land!), and the Administration had been warned by Richard Clarke and others...so it still makes yiou feel safe if they spy on a few activist groups and Muslims>? I'll tell you, there's thingws worse than getting blown up (being dead..you are a good Christiena arent you?? WHY are you guys so afraid of death??)--and having Dubya's --or any rich guy's-head up my arse is one of them! I'll take my chances--oh, but I can;t ! Too many US citizens are terrified and think that the incompetent US Gov't. w3ill protect them by arresting Code Pink and Earth First! And Tim McVey---oh, that's right, they never got him until too late....I hope it's not too late for theuS!!

Friday, July 11, 2008 08:04 AM

Lies....

-To assert that is simply to make assertions with no basis whatsoever. GG-

...and the Lying Liars who tell them.

Friday, July 11, 2008 08:05 AM

Very, very scary.....

Scary!

Friday, July 11, 2008 08:05 AM

Looks like I'm right about misrepresentations...

So how about just those, then -- international calls and "cross-border" emails of yours -- will you record those and forward them all to me? -- GlennGreenwald

Which part of "Anything I want to keep secret, can easily be kept secret." didn't register?

Look Glenn, I'm not trying to be harsh here, but the comments from people who felt physically ill, and contributed their next to last dollar for your cause, got to me. They looked to you as Leader, and from where I sit, you used them. Taking legitimate issues and blowing them all out of proportion to the extent where nightmares ensue, is abuse of position.

Friday, July 11, 2008 08:05 AM

Hmmm, who to trust here...

...Shooter, who I don't know from Adam, and who says that this is no big deal -- like Amazon keeping track of your purchases -- or Senator Russ Feingold, who says that we will regret passing this law?

Gosh, it's so difficult to decide, but I think I'll have to go with Feingold, who has absolutely nothing to gain by taking this stand (which is nothing short of courageous in this political climate), and who I'm pretty sure knows a lot more than Shooter does about the reality of the wiretapping program.

And, as for "situational awareness", this argument would be akin to saying that a woman should have "situational awareness" and expect to be raped if she walks down a deserted street late at night, and that's just too bad then.

Friday, July 11, 2008 08:06 AM

Can you please give some examples

That aren't taken from Coulter's testosterone-fueled rants!

Friday, July 11, 2008 08:07 AM

Thank you , Jeannette

I wish I'd said that

Friday, July 11, 2008 08:10 AM

Yeah! Like I said...

I wish I'd said it like that.

Friday, July 11, 2008 08:12 AM

Listen to the podcast bud....

Wire taps are not synonymous with data-mining.

Exactly. That's the problem here, misrepresenting data-mining with wiretaps to scare people.

Under the new FISA legislation, the N.S.A., but not the Sierra Club, is allowed to target individual phone conversations.

Thats always been true in some situations, hence the four points about what FISA DOESN'T COVER, REGULATE, APPLY TO, or ANYTHING ELSE.

You are arguing against your own straw man; if you read the many posts here, you'll find not one objection to data-mining among them. -- dr rick

Terrific, send the ACLU an email about pulling the suit.

Friday, July 11, 2008 08:17 AM

"Anything I want to keep secret, can easily be kept secret."

Are the terrorists as smart as shooter? What's the point of monitoring phones and e-mails then?

Friday, July 11, 2008 08:17 AM

More fearmongering

Except that Bushista is allowed to declare ANY U.S. citizen at anytime to no longer be a citizen, without having to tell anyone. -- brightstar65

You are wrong. Habeas Corpus is alive and well for anyone in the US and even prisoners overseas. It's not nice to scare people for no good reason.

Friday, July 11, 2008 08:18 AM

shooter

When you say anything you want to keep secret can be kept secret, you mean: communicate it to no one. That is not the point. People need and want to communicate. Communication needs to be kept private. For example, you are a republican; you support business. How can business be done without privacy?

Friday, July 11, 2008 08:18 AM

shooter242

Exactly. That's the problem here, misrepresenting data-mining with wiretaps to scare people.

Just to be clear -- it's your belief that the Government, under the new FISA law, can only examine the data relating to international calls in which U.S. citizens participate, but can't listen in on those calls without a warrant?

That's actually your understanding of what this new FISA law allows?

You do realize that you don't have the slightest clue what this law does and that you've demonstrated beyond any doubt? Please answer the question above about whether that's your understanding of the law.

Friday, July 11, 2008 08:20 AM

The records show

that it ie Bush who confuses cross-border and domestic issues. We are on a slippery slope here...Those who would give up liberty for a little safety deserve neither...you get the gist.I'm trying to figure out whether, if it was a different administration, would i feel differently about it (after all, no one with a brain between their ears trusts Dubya anymore). I've decided no--because i don't want Obama or McCain to have this power either. For osme of us, broken by the "Free Mkt" (only for the poor, who get no subsidies, and never get "bailed out"--if we had a truly "level playing field", these Capts. of Industry would lose everytime!), and certainly for Vietnam Vets (the ones I work with), our civil liberties are about all we have ,left! No right to health care, housing, food, clothing, to even survive! At least let people die with their rights on!Turn all your personal info into the CIA, if you like.

Most Active Letters Threads

502

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
426

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
257

The face of rotted Washington

Evan Bayh demands more debt-financed war - fought by others - while boasting that he's a stern "deficit hawk."
210

Is Obama's civil liberties record understandable?

Was it unreasonable to expect him to adhere to his commitments regarding the Constitution?
122

Bigotry wins in Switzlerland

By voting to ban the construction of minarets, Switzerland apes the most extreme intolerance in the Muslim world

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon