This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Thursday, July 3, 2008 12:00 AM

The Al-Haramain ruling and the current Congress

Another federal court's ruling reveals how false and extreme is the case for warrantless eavesdropping and telecom immunity.

Read other letters about this article

  • Thursday, July 3, 2008 06:34 PM

    macgupta, bystander

    I didn't get that, either. I saw it as a way for Obama to address the issue on his terms and in a way in which he doesn't and won't give anything up.

    Read some of the comments of his advisors - they're as firm as Obama is about his decision. For example, from Ben Rhodes: "I understand your disappointment. As Barack said, he would not have written the bill this way. But as for the civil libertarians, I think we all believe that the balance between security and liberty was badly skewed under this Administration. This bill continues a restoration of that balance...."

    When someone says to me, "I understand your disappointment..." I know they're not giving in. At least my mother never did ;-)

Most Active Letters Threads

685

Obama's exceedingly familiar justifications for escalation

The "new" approach to Afghanistan touted by White House officials seems quite old
597

The commendably missing element from Obama's speech

There was no pretense that human rights is our goal, or the likely outcome, in escalating the war
440

The face of rotted Washington

Evan Bayh demands more debt-financed war - fought by others - while boasting that he's a stern "deficit hawk."
317

Yes, it's Obama's war now

An uninspiring speech sells a dubious policy, but progressives who feel betrayed have only themselves to blame
209

Bigotry wins in Switzerland

By voting to ban the construction of minarets, Switzerland apes the most extreme intolerance in the Muslim world

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon