- Top Features:
- War Room
- Glenn Greenwald
- Broadsheet
- Joan Walsh
- Camille Paglia
- Since You Asked
- Follow Salon:
Read other letters about this article
Someone's probably found this already, but anyway, from an Obama speech on August 1, 2007, "The War We Need to Win":
" This Administration also puts forward a false choice between the liberties we cherish and the security we demand. I will provide our intelligence and law enforcement agencies with the tools they need to track and take out the terrorists without undermining our Constitution and our freedom.
That means no more illegal wire-tapping of American citizens. No more national security letters to spy on citizens who are not suspected of a crime. No more tracking citizens who do nothing more than protest a misguided war. No more ignoring the law when it is inconvenient. That is not who we are. And it is not what is necessary to defeat the terrorists. The FISA court works. The separation of powers works. Our Constitution works. We will again set an example for the world that the law is not subject to the whims of stubborn rulers, and that justice is not arbitrary. "
Does Obama expect us to understand his flip-flop? Maybe that's the worst part, that he doesn't think we have the intelligence or attention spans to realize how awful this is. What he definitely doesn't appreciate is how one single moment of weakness on an issue as important as this will follow him into the White House.
