This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Wednesday, June 18, 2008 12:00 AM

Comcast's efforts to protect members of Congress who, in turn, protect Comcast

Two weeks ago, Comcast rejected a political ad as defamatory because it stated that telecoms "broke the law." Today, the NYT wrote that telecoms "broke the law by helping Mr. Bush carry out his warrantless wiretapping operation."

Read other letters about this article

  • Wednesday, June 18, 2008 11:00 AM

    Take Them at Their Word

    If they hadn't broken the law, they wouldn't need amnesty, would they? So let's hear Comcast come out against this bill on the grounds that passing it would imply they had broken the law -- wouldn't that be defamatory too?

Most Active Letters Threads

360

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
189

Is Obama's civil liberties record understandable?

Was it unreasonable to expect him to adhere to his commitments regarding the Constitution?
93

How dare you criticize wasteful defense spending!

So you think it's only terrorist-appeasing lefties who are down on Pentagon profligacy? Think again
47

Have yourself a very merry black Friday

The author of "Scroogenomics" explains why holiday shopping is a drain on the wallet and the holiday spirit
46

Police to talk to Woods

Early morning crash raises questions, and revives tabloid speculation

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon