This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Wednesday, June 18, 2008 12:00 AM

Comcast's efforts to protect members of Congress who, in turn, protect Comcast

Two weeks ago, Comcast rejected a political ad as defamatory because it stated that telecoms "broke the law." Today, the NYT wrote that telecoms "broke the law by helping Mr. Bush carry out his warrantless wiretapping operation."

Read other letters about this article

  • Wednesday, June 18, 2008 11:18 AM

    So are they all, all honorable men

    Penner has a good idea. Instead of implying that "they broke the law" use some Shakespearean irony on them and let it be known that they wouldn't break the law because they are all honorable men but if they didn't break any laws why do they need amnesty and immunity from prosecution for laws that they didn't break.

    They can't have it both ways. If they didn't break the law then they have no need for amnesty/immunity. If they must have amnesty/immunity it is a tacit admission that they broke the law.

Most Active Letters Threads

660

Obama's exceedingly familiar justifications for escalation

The "new" approach to Afghanistan touted by White House officials seems quite old
543

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
437

The face of rotted Washington

Evan Bayh demands more debt-financed war - fought by others - while boasting that he's a stern "deficit hawk."
208

Bigotry wins in Switzerland

By voting to ban the construction of minarets, Switzerland apes the most extreme intolerance in the Muslim world
149

Mike Huckabee's fatally bad judgment

Brutality by another Huck-pardoned criminal suggests the 2012 GOP hopeful listened more to pastors than prosecutors

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon