This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Monday, June 9, 2008 12:00 AM

Comcast censors criticisms of itself and Rep. Carney

The telecom and cable operator rejects an ad, run by numerous other stations and newspapers, bringing to light its lawbreaking and the actions of a congressman who receives substantial donations from Comcast.

Read other letters about this article

  • Monday, June 9, 2008 03:28 PM

    che

    "Cannot the rules under which it operates be changed?"

    I think this is a fascinating area. Comcast and similar companies (along with their and our actions--such as being discussed here) reside at the confluence of corporate/business rights, journalistic rights, and free speech rights. Seems like a pretty tangled web, but then I'm not a lawyer and don't know what the case law says.

    Does Comcast utilize public space as part of its business? Is the Carney ad considered free political speech? (I note that it cost money, and the SCOTUS says money is free speech...). What obligation does Comcast have in terms of public benefit and public good, not only as a news distributor and venue owner, but also simply as a corporation?

Most Active Letters Threads

516

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
426

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
378

The face of rotted Washington

Evan Bayh demands more debt-financed war - fought by others - while boasting that he's a stern "deficit hawk."
210

Is Obama's civil liberties record understandable?

Was it unreasonable to expect him to adhere to his commitments regarding the Constitution?
175

Bigotry wins in Switzerland

By voting to ban the construction of minarets, Switzerland apes the most extreme intolerance in the Muslim world

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon