This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Monday, June 9, 2008 12:00 AM

Comcast censors criticisms of itself and Rep. Carney

The telecom and cable operator rejects an ad, run by numerous other stations and newspapers, bringing to light its lawbreaking and the actions of a congressman who receives substantial donations from Comcast.

Read other letters about this article

  • Monday, June 9, 2008 03:24 PM

    Man is Comcast stupid--predictably

    Organizations in the position that Comcast is in--i.e. having aided and abetted in knowing and egregious lawbreaking (with respect to the warrantless surveillance programs), and fearful of being held responsible for it--invariably do the absolutely worst thing possible by going into full-on denial, obstruct and stonewall mode, which invariably comes back to haunt them. Because not only did they break the original law in question, FISA, but now they're compounding this by breaking other, secondary but just as serious laws, having to do with censorship and license violation (I don't know the laws surrounding this but my understanding is that telcoms do NOT have the right to censor content based solely on political value, nor to deliberately misrepresent what is obviously politically-motivated censorship by lying about it).

    I think that Comcast is just setting itself up for serious legal action against it--civil for now, and if Obama wins, criminal--that could actually cost it the vast sums of money that it falsely claims current lawsuits against it could cost it, if not its license itself. What we might be looking at here is AT&T, Comcast, Verizon, etc., all but begging the government to clamp down hard on them and break up their monopolies. That would take years, but I think it's going to happen--for other, unrelated reasons as well, of course--and this just might be the proverbial straw that broke this camel's back. Mukasey's obviously not going to take this anywhere, and civil suits could take years to unfold. But Comcast just committed a very serious mistake, I believe, by setting itself up for serious legal action down the line.

    Screw tort reform. What we need is MORE tort, not less, against such corporations.

Most Active Letters Threads

370

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
205

Is Obama's civil liberties record understandable?

Was it unreasonable to expect him to adhere to his commitments regarding the Constitution?
104

How dare you criticize wasteful defense spending!

So you think it's only terrorist-appeasing lefties who are down on Pentagon profligacy? Think again
86

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
51

Police to talk to Woods

Early morning crash raises questions, and revives tabloid speculation

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon