This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Monday, June 9, 2008 12:00 AM

Comcast censors criticisms of itself and Rep. Carney

The telecom and cable operator rejects an ad, run by numerous other stations and newspapers, bringing to light its lawbreaking and the actions of a congressman who receives substantial donations from Comcast.

Read other letters about this article

  • Tuesday, June 10, 2008 06:56 AM

    @ macgupta

    What the Internet provider should be selling you is a committed bandwidth rate - which is a guaranteed bandwidth, you will alway s have at least that much throughput - and a burstable rate, which is the maximum throughput you can have in ideal conditions. The 5Mbps that is hyped today is the burstable rate.

    Different services require different bandwidth profiles (and suffer to a greater or lesser degree when these requirements aren't met.

    VoIP require very low bandwidth, but it is continuous and must be with a very small guaranteed maximum latency (even with good echo cancellation, which becomes more difficult for longer latencies, you may have experienced the headache of talking on top of the other person when you have a sat line with long delays...).

    Streaming video requires a higher continuous bandwidth, but is a bit more tolerant to delays as long as they're not all over the place.

    Web browsing is very bursty, and it would be nice to have high bandwidth, but not necessary. Delays (shorter than a couple of seconds) are pretty much inconsequential.

    Protocols that require acknowledgement (such as TCP/IP) may have an effective bandwidth less than carrier bandwidth due to the acknowledgement window size (and in such instances, the bandwidth and latencies in both directions will come into play). Streaming video and VoIP are UDP/RTP (non-acknowleding protocols) for the data, but the control (SIP, etc.) is TCP.

    It's quite important to know the nature of the traffic (and even your benchmarks (such as DSLReports.com) use a range of traffic types in their computations (and the end number is an "average" of these).

    Simply guaranteeing bandwidth is not enough (and is wasteful too; even in the circuit-switched world, if the phone company had to guarantee you a channel, they'd have to overbuild tremendously [and mobile phone companys would be out of business; you've probably all heard "fast busy" or "all circuits are busy" announcements at one time or another).

    Telling you what the burstable rate is is useful (and is what they tell you most of the time, because it's the biggets number they can use), but only one of a number of things that will affect your customer satisfaction.

    </LECTURE>

    :-)

    Cheers,

Most Active Letters Threads

738

The commendably missing element from Obama's speech

There was no pretense that human rights is our goal, or the likely outcome, in escalating the war
688

Obama's exceedingly familiar justifications for escalation

The "new" approach to Afghanistan touted by White House officials seems quite old
352

America's regression

It's almost impossible to find a nation with as many torture advocates as the U.S. has.
329

Yes, it's Obama's war now

An uninspiring speech sells a dubious policy, but progressives who feel betrayed have only themselves to blame
208

The poster boy for progressive self-delusion

Read Hayden's 2008 Obama endorsement to remember the way the left sold our centrist president to itself

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon