This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Wednesday, May 28, 2008 12:00 AM

Network news anchors praise the job they did in the run-up to the war

Charlie Gibson says that it's not the job of the media to "debate" with political leaders, merely to pose questions.

Read other letters about this article

  • Wednesday, May 28, 2008 04:00 PM

    @Derbig

    That is so interesting! Who were you working for?

    Thanks for asking about it! Actually, I was a freelancer who worked for several different groups. The areas of focus, more or less integrated depending on the project, are generally infrastructure (presses, radio/TV stations, network development, technical acquisition and training), professionalization (journalism training, business/management training, forming journo associations), business development (putting the sector together, distribution, etc) and media law.

    One of the things I did was fundraising, so I would raise the money for one group then go work in the field on those projects (the business or technical aspects, managing the project, doing independent assessments and evaluations, organizing training), then work on other proposals while there, etc.

    The groups who do this kind of thing are pretty diverse. Some are non-profit NGOs. Internews is an 'network organization' that includes a US 'hub' and a semi-autonomous node (Internews Europe)that raises it's own money and pursues its own projects. Other country 'nodes' are affiliates of these two. The International Center for Journalists is an American NGO that runs the Knight International Media Fellows program, sort of a Peace Corps for journalists, and does some longer projects. IREX is the 600-pound gorilla in the space, but they are a for-profit outfit. There are smaller NGOs who are not as well-funded and tend to focus on particular countries. I've done work for pretty much all of them, plus a British charity I refuse to name because even seeing their initials on the screen will cause my hands to shake.

    As more money has flowed into these projects, the 'Beltway Bandits' have moved in. Creative Associates, Chemonics, guys like that. I haven't done any direct work for them, but have helped develop joint proposals they did with NGOs (another long story).

    Who pays for all this? Govt aid organizations (USAID, British DFID, German GTz, EU), the UN, Soros, private foundations (McCarthur, Ford, smaller players), and occasional odds and sods like some local JayCees or Chambers of Commerce.

    Finally ... a link to the website of Pajhwok, the Afghan news agency I mentioned, at my sig. They supply every newspaper and radio station in the country, plus the non-state owned TV. Reuters, BBC, AP and others shamelessly steal from Pajhwok; 'Pajhwok' means 'echo' and/or 'reflection' in both Dari and Pashtu, Afghanistan's two major languages. They publish in five languages (sometimes the English is a little rough, and produces amusing results).

Most Active Letters Threads

426

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
249

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
210

Is Obama's civil liberties record understandable?

Was it unreasonable to expect him to adhere to his commitments regarding the Constitution?
111

How dare you criticize wasteful defense spending!

So you think it's only terrorist-appeasing lefties who are down on Pentagon profligacy? Think again
57

Police to talk to Woods

Early morning crash raises questions, and revives tabloid speculation

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon