Letters to the Editor

This letter is associated with the following article:
Their newest Op-Ed writer makes yet another sloppy, factually false claim in service of his trite partisan agenda.
  • Glenn @ James65

    Glenn, doesn't James65 have a point? Brooks' piece was shockingly pro-Obama, but your column today doesn't really lend that impression.

    Sure, Brooks starts the piece by making some points critical of Obama, but these turn out to be like batting-practice pitches that he rather helpfully allows Obama to blast out of the park. I also didn't see anything about Barack having to call Brooks - but I may have missed something?

    (I don't disagree BTW that the NYT op-ed page has an appalling lack of diverse outlook.)