This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Saturday, May 10, 2008 12:00 AM

How the military analyst program controlled news coverage: in the Pentagon's own words

"We develop a core group from within our media analyst list of those that we can count on to carry our water. They become the key go to guys for the networks and it begins to weed out the less reliably friendly analysts by the networks themselves."

Read other letters about this article

  • Sunday, May 11, 2008 05:46 PM

    @LWM

    This slim volume (link at sig) was written by my dissertation supervisor and mentor, a guy named Michael Taylor who was well known in some very small circles but invisible outside them. He started out as a math prof at Essex, did another PhD in political philosophy at Yale, and came to the US later (much to my benefit). At Essex, he lived on a commune 20k or so outside of town and ran to and from class every day. Great guy (for a Brit). (Just kidding, Rowan). He had a very strong influence on me, and we had some great conversations about 'nested communities' within hierarchical organizations (like the army).

    His previous book, "Anarchy and Cooperation" (later reprinted as "The Possibility of Cooperation"), was a technical and largely game theoretic examination of cooperative collective action. This one has more history and anthropology added in, and its more accessible (though still kind of turgid).

    Taylor was also part of the circle of scholars who developed the 'social capital' idea first articulated by Glenn Loury, formalized by James Coleman and then monetized (:>) by Robert Putnam. The crowd included Douglass North and a handful of other notables who gathered under a grant that Putnam facilitated. Coleman died shortly after they started meeting.

    I don't think Taylor was a big believer in 'social capital', or even anarchy, by the tail end of his career, but it was another piece of the puzzle (along with transactions costs, for example) that he was trying to wrestle with.

    The first book is out of print, but this one is still kicking. Recommend you give it a gander ...

Most Active Letters Threads

733

The commendably missing element from Obama's speech

There was no pretense that human rights is our goal, or the likely outcome, in escalating the war
688

Obama's exceedingly familiar justifications for escalation

The "new" approach to Afghanistan touted by White House officials seems quite old
329

Yes, it's Obama's war now

An uninspiring speech sells a dubious policy, but progressives who feel betrayed have only themselves to blame
305

America's regression

It's almost impossible to find a nation with as many torture advocates as the U.S. has.
192

The poster boy for progressive self-delusion

Read Hayden's 2008 Obama endorsement to remember the way the left sold our centrist president to itself

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon