Letters to the Editor

This letter is associated with the following article:
"We develop a core group from within our media analyst list of those that we can count on to carry our water. They become the key go to guys for the networks and it begins to weed out the less reliably friendly analysts by the networks themselves."
  • shooter242

    We are commanded by the civilians, yes: but if given an unlawful order are not supposed to follow it. This does not seem to relate to the point Glenn is making: officers were asked to do illegal things, thus compromising their oath. I myself always refused what I took to be an unlawful order, which sometimes got me into rather strange confrontations (and ultimately, yes, I did leave, because it seemed to me the higher in rank you went the more corrupt it became, so that it began to seem that a life of continual confrontation would be the result). But that the military is under the control of the civilian politicians does not negate an oath to uphold and defend the constitution, and that seems to me to be the key point.