This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Saturday, May 10, 2008 12:00 AM

How the military analyst program controlled news coverage: in the Pentagon's own words

"We develop a core group from within our media analyst list of those that we can count on to carry our water. They become the key go to guys for the networks and it begins to weed out the less reliably friendly analysts by the networks themselves."

Read other letters about this article

  • Saturday, May 10, 2008 10:01 AM

    A Question For Glen

    Glen,

    Thanks again for thoughtful analysis on a truly dispiriting story about how our media and government collude to fool the American public. It's sad to say, but I don't buy anything I see on any cable news show without research myself. The level of incestuous contacts between the media and the people they are supposed to be reporting on is disgusting.

    I do have to wonder, however, if we will see the same level of energy and vigor to get the real story out when we have a more politically friendly administration in office come next year, assuming, of course, the Dems take the WH in the fall.

    I hope that you do because I think what you do is too important to let things fall by the wayside because you do not want to harm your political allies. I would encourage you to do so, but I understand the realities if you do not.

    I just wonder if the level of repulsion and urgency will be expressed that we have come to expect of you. I will wait and watch and see if you are able to do what you do without political interference. Sorry, if I sound cynical, but I'm guessing we will see a shift in tone and substance in your articles. I think we'll find that you will not be that different from these generals you bemoan in regards to pushing a particular angle, because otherwise it would not be in your best economic interest to do so.

    Not to pick on you, but the truth and the reporting that we need is so much bigger than a political ideology and a particular point of view. I'm sure we'll have to rely on the center right pubs to do a more thorough review of a new Dem administration when that time comes.

    We need a truly independent media, but how do we get that when the truth is not a profitable business? (And obviously, I understand truth has perceptible differences, but I hope you get my point.)

    Regards,

    Dan

Most Active Letters Threads

738

The commendably missing element from Obama's speech

There was no pretense that human rights is our goal, or the likely outcome, in escalating the war
688

Obama's exceedingly familiar justifications for escalation

The "new" approach to Afghanistan touted by White House officials seems quite old
348

America's regression

It's almost impossible to find a nation with as many torture advocates as the U.S. has.
329

Yes, it's Obama's war now

An uninspiring speech sells a dubious policy, but progressives who feel betrayed have only themselves to blame
208

The poster boy for progressive self-delusion

Read Hayden's 2008 Obama endorsement to remember the way the left sold our centrist president to itself

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon