This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Saturday, May 10, 2008 12:00 AM

How the military analyst program controlled news coverage: in the Pentagon's own words

"We develop a core group from within our media analyst list of those that we can count on to carry our water. They become the key go to guys for the networks and it begins to weed out the less reliably friendly analysts by the networks themselves."
Glenn Greenwald

Read other letters about this article

  • Saturday, May 10, 2008 01:27 PM

    Bucky

    I'm not so much hypersensitive to the word itself. After all, I possess said equipment. ;-}

    But the (most) common usage of it as a term to somehow demean men is, I think, insulting to those of us who are rather fond of ourselves and our natural accoutrements.

    With that, I'm off to other commitments. Have at it boys!

    Jebbie, I hope you didn't hurt yourself too much when you tripped over my comment. :-)

    —Pedinska Read Pedinska's other letters

    Flag
Read other letters about this article

Most Active Letters Threads

688

Obama's exceedingly familiar justifications for escalation

The "new" approach to Afghanistan touted by White House officials seems quite old
Glenn Greenwald Read article
678

The commendably missing element from Obama's speech

There was no pretense that human rights is our goal, or the likely outcome, in escalating the war
Glenn Greenwald Read article
440

The face of rotted Washington

Evan Bayh demands more debt-financed war - fought by others - while boasting that he's a stern "deficit hawk."
Glenn Greenwald Read article
323

Yes, it's Obama's war now

An uninspiring speech sells a dubious policy, but progressives who feel betrayed have only themselves to blame
Joan Walsh Read article
209

Bigotry wins in Switzerland

By voting to ban the construction of minarets, Switzerland apes the most extreme intolerance in the Muslim world
By Juan Cole Read article

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon