Letters posted here are associated with the following article:
The letters thread is now closed.
“Nope. You've got it wrong once again. My purpose is to heap scorn and ridicule on the usual trolls and eedjits here”
By insulting them and throwing ad homs about. Think before you type.
“and provide some amusement for some of the others here that can appreciate the wonders of skilled verbal vivisection.”
Calling Shooter 'Shitter', me 'Flatulence Warning' and spelling every third word like your mother/sister says them could only be considered 'skilled verbal vivisection' in the same unlettered universe in which Glenn is considered a talented prose stylist. The problem with you Arne is that you adopt the manner of a smart ass, by you aren't smart. That makes you simply an ass.
“No. If he wants me to shut up, he's got my e-mail (or he can ban me).”
I'm sure he's got more than your email. Besides, as if he would ban his left hand eunuch.
“I'd note that your "example" here does not answer my request. What's "obsequious" about expressing praise for good work? Have you read the book? I have.”
There's a reason fuckwit telecom engineers aren't paid to review books. You obviously don't recall the post in question. You thanked him for the book just after pre-ordering it – before you'd read it. You were praising 'good work' you hadn't read – why? Because you are little more than a wide-eyed Greenwald groupie. Even your blog is basically regurgitated G-bile; you've even adopted Glenn's habit of trying to pass off sophomoric semantic tics as prose style.
And, for the record, Glenn's 'good work' (read shite partisan hatchet job of interest to nobody but those who don't need to read it to know they agree with – in other words, you) has still not been reviewed by any mainstream publication of any stripe, apart from Publishers Weekly, who skewered it.