Letters posted here are associated with the following article:

255
Letters
Wednesday, May 7, 2008 12:00 AM

McCain embraces Bush's radical views of executive power

The GOP nominee actually complains that it is judicial power that is excessive and is unduly limiting the powers of the president.

The letters thread is now closed.

View:
Friday, May 9, 2008 01:40 PM

More rubbish from the inbred weasel

“Nope. You've got it wrong once again. My purpose is to heap scorn and ridicule on the usual trolls and eedjits here”

By insulting them and throwing ad homs about. Think before you type.

“and provide some amusement for some of the others here that can appreciate the wonders of skilled verbal vivisection.”

Calling Shooter 'Shitter', me 'Flatulence Warning' and spelling every third word like your mother/sister says them could only be considered 'skilled verbal vivisection' in the same unlettered universe in which Glenn is considered a talented prose stylist. The problem with you Arne is that you adopt the manner of a smart ass, by you aren't smart. That makes you simply an ass.

“No. If he wants me to shut up, he's got my e-mail (or he can ban me).”

I'm sure he's got more than your email. Besides, as if he would ban his left hand eunuch.

“I'd note that your "example" here does not answer my request. What's "obsequious" about expressing praise for good work? Have you read the book? I have.”

There's a reason fuckwit telecom engineers aren't paid to review books. You obviously don't recall the post in question. You thanked him for the book just after pre-ordering it – before you'd read it. You were praising 'good work' you hadn't read – why? Because you are little more than a wide-eyed Greenwald groupie. Even your blog is basically regurgitated G-bile; you've even adopted Glenn's habit of trying to pass off sophomoric semantic tics as prose style.

And, for the record, Glenn's 'good work' (read shite partisan hatchet job of interest to nobody but those who don't need to read it to know they agree with – in other words, you) has still not been reviewed by any mainstream publication of any stripe, apart from Publishers Weekly, who skewered it.

Most Active Letters Threads

426

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
409

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
210

Is Obama's civil liberties record understandable?

Was it unreasonable to expect him to adhere to his commitments regarding the Constitution?
111

How dare you criticize wasteful defense spending!

So you think it's only terrorist-appeasing lefties who are down on Pentagon profligacy? Think again
59

Police to talk to Woods

Early morning crash raises questions, and revives tabloid speculation

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon