“Nope. You've got it wrong once again. My purpose is to heap scorn and ridicule on the usual trolls and eedjits here”

By insulting them and throwing ad homs about. Think before you type.

“and provide some amusement for some of the others here that can appreciate the wonders of skilled verbal vivisection.”

Calling Shooter 'Shitter', me 'Flatulence Warning' and spelling every third word like your mother/sister says them could only be considered 'skilled verbal vivisection' in the same unlettered universe in which Glenn is considered a talented prose stylist. The problem with you Arne is that you adopt the manner of a smart ass, by you aren't smart. That makes you simply an ass.

“No. If he wants me to shut up, he's got my e-mail (or he can ban me).”

I'm sure he's got more than your email. Besides, as if he would ban his left hand eunuch.

“I'd note that your "example" here does not answer my request. What's "obsequious" about expressing praise for good work? Have you read the book? I have.”

There's a reason fuckwit telecom engineers aren't paid to review books. You obviously don't recall the post in question. You thanked him for the book just after pre-ordering it – before you'd read it. You were praising 'good work' you hadn't read – why? Because you are little more than a wide-eyed Greenwald groupie. Even your blog is basically regurgitated G-bile; you've even adopted Glenn's habit of trying to pass off sophomoric semantic tics as prose style.

And, for the record, Glenn's 'good work' (read shite partisan hatchet job of interest to nobody but those who don't need to read it to know they agree with – in other words, you) has still not been reviewed by any mainstream publication of any stripe, apart from Publishers Weekly, who skewered it.

[Glenn]: "But if the purpose in posting seems to be just to vent anger towards other commenters you personally dislike, that's a good indication that some restrain is in order -- all with the goal of preserving the quality of the discussions here. Thanks."

[ABNS]: Now, let's face it; you have no other purpose in exchanging messages with Shooter (or me or indeed anyone else who isn't a left-wing headcase) other than to vent anger and spout ad homs.

Nope. You've got it wrong once again. My purpose is to heap scorn and ridicule on the usual trolls and eedjits here, and provide some amusement for some of the others here that can appreciate the wonders of skilled verbal vivisection. Sorry you haven't twigged to that yet, but then again you are kind of slow....

No anger. No "ad homs". "Jes' the facts, ma'am", so to speak.

Perhaps the little has [sic] G has given you immunity from that instruction though.

No. If he wants me to shut up, he's got my e-mail (or he can ban me). But the point of the matter is that he was addressing different repeated 'discussions'. If you actually paid attention, and had more than one neurone to click together, you might have figured that out. Clue fer ya, although I suspect it won't help: There's a constant pissing contest between a few of the 'libertarians' here and the rest (and then there's the "anti-Semitic"/"No, I'm not" discussions that crop up too, but they at least have a small modicum of content). This has degenerated into a bit of personal animosity as well. I learned long ago that discussing or arguing with such people doesn't get very far and isn't illuminating.

[Arne]: "How so, my "Little Suzie"? Wake up and tell me when I've "defend[ed] the little G against all criticism". And document your assertion."

You are a painfully obsequious sycophant when it comes to Glenn, Arne (checkout the post where you thanked Glenn on behalf of humanity for writing a book you hadn't even read yet). If you haven't any awareness of that fact, that's no surprise to me cos you're a dumb fuck.

I'd note that your "example" here does not answer my request.

What's "obsequious" about expressing praise for good work? Have you read the book? I have.

FWIW, I do correct Glenn on the rare occasions I think he has something wrong, and I will disagree with him on occasion. Something that you'd know if you actually did any investigation.

[Arne]: "You want to get slapped some more, come over to my blog,"

Which would constitute for a 50 percent traffic increase for you....

But no discernible change in the number of sentient visitors. C'est la vie.

... I came over to your blog once in order to confirm my suspicion that you were the result of generations of uninhibited incest. With that suspicion confirmed beyond doubt, I have no need to return, even though it would be nice for you if someone other than your mother read the tedious shite that a combination of vanity and stupidity led you believe anyone would have an interest in.

As you will. Stay stoopid and uninformed if you'd like ... as if you had any choice in the former.

Cheers,

"No, you moron. Glenn was referring to other types of endless 'arguments'."

You are a monumental fuckwit, Arne.

"But if the purpose in posting seems to be just to vent anger towards other commenters you personally dislike, that's a good indication that some restrain is in order -- all with the goal of preserving the quality of the discussions here. Thanks."

Now, let's face it; you have no other purpose in exchanging messages with Shooter (or me or indeed anyone else who isn't a left-wing headcase) other than to vent anger and spout ad homs.

Perhaps the little has G has given you immunity from that instruction though.

"How so, my "Little Suzie"? Wake up and tell me when I've "defend[ed] the little G against all criticism". And document your assertion."

You are a painfully obsequious sycophant when it comes to Glenn, Arne (checkout the post where you thanked Glenn on behalf of humanity for writing a book you hadn't even read yet). If you haven't any awareness of that fact, that's no surprise to me cos you're a dumb fuck.

"You want to get slapped some more, come over to my blog,"

Which would constitute for a 50 percent traffic increase for you. I came over to your blog once in order to confirm my suspicion that you were the result of generations of uninhibited incest. With that suspicion confirmed beyond doubt, I have no need to return, even though it would be nice for you if someone other than your mother read the tedious shite that a combination of vanity and stupidity led you believe anyone would have an interest in.