This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Wednesday, May 7, 2008 12:00 AM

McCain embraces Bush's radical views of executive power

The GOP nominee actually complains that it is judicial power that is excessive and is unduly limiting the powers of the president.

Read other letters about this article

  • Wednesday, May 7, 2008 08:46 PM

    @ Baldie McEagle

    I'm sorry if I got too arcane with calvinist hermeneutics and so forth, but my concern is that opposition in the USA comes largely from the so-called 'libertarians,' whose alternative is a sort of utopian hyper-individualism, and my argument would suggest that this is just pushing the problem even further, and digging the hole even deeper. Another way of expressing this would be to say that 'sociology' in the European sense seems to be largely condemned in the USA a sort of 'socialist' ideology, because it treats 'society' as a really existing phenomenon with laws of its own. US hyper-individualism is so extreme, even in its mainstream forms, that the mere idea of 'sociology' tends to be regarded as a sort of wedge whereby totalitarianism can enter in. As a result, 'society' keeps making a 'return of the repressed' to the USA, in the pathological form of collective apocalyptic hysteria.

    I have lost a lot of my respect for the antiwar.com crowd over this. Ask yourselves, what the HELL is Gary North - an unabashed theocratic totalitarian - doing posing as a 'libertarian'? Answer : theocracy is defined as an 'alternative' to government, because 'government' is defined in terms of the First Amendment, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion." The resulting utopianism regarding an imaginary theocratic alternative is yet another reason for the US infatuation with religious zionism, and simultaneously for its terror of 'Islamism.' This is a collective, schizophrenic, dissociative split, in my opinion.

    There is probably something in Tocqueville I could have used to introduce my argument much more comprehensibly, but I have never bothered to read him. I have an awful lot of books I never manage to read, mostly dealing with political philosophy and its relationship to religion, but to be self-educated in this field (i.e. not supervised by an academic tutor) is to condemn oneself to almost certainly becoming a 'crank.'

Most Active Letters Threads

624

Obama's exceedingly familiar justifications for escalation

The "new" approach to Afghanistan touted by White House officials seems quite old
543

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
437

The face of rotted Washington

Evan Bayh demands more debt-financed war - fought by others - while boasting that he's a stern "deficit hawk."
206

Bigotry wins in Switzerland

By voting to ban the construction of minarets, Switzerland apes the most extreme intolerance in the Muslim world
148

Mike Huckabee's fatally bad judgment

Brutality by another Huck-pardoned criminal suggests the 2012 GOP hopeful listened more to pastors than prosecutors

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon