This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Saturday, May 3, 2008 12:00 AM

Fred Hiatt on the noble glories of occupation

The Washington Post editorialist says that mere airstrikes are bad because they result in civilian deaths, cause displacement and aid al-Qaida recruitment. Therefore, we should invade and occupy countries instead.

Read other letters about this article

  • Saturday, May 3, 2008 08:36 AM

    You can't occupy just one

    One of the real dangers of "nation-building" is the increased motivation to continue. The boundary has been breached so the inhibition is reduced.

    I fear we will hear more and more of these types of arguments. They go hand in hand with the now prevalent notion among many neocons that the Iraq invasion was a good idea badly executed (everyone prefers to forget the abject failure of Afghanistan).

    We have learned from our mistakes, they posit, so next time we will do it much better.

    Let's ask the Roman Empire how that worked out.

Most Active Letters Threads

423

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
210

Is Obama's civil liberties record understandable?

Was it unreasonable to expect him to adhere to his commitments regarding the Constitution?
206

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
111

How dare you criticize wasteful defense spending!

So you think it's only terrorist-appeasing lefties who are down on Pentagon profligacy? Think again
56

Police to talk to Woods

Early morning crash raises questions, and revives tabloid speculation

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon